[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemd-fsck?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 05/09/2014 11:04 AM, Neil Williams wrote:

> On Fri, 9 May 2014 16:06:46 +0200 Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 9 May 2014, Andrew Shadura wrote:
>> 
>>> Changes to the default init system should not affect existing
>>> setups.
>> 
>> Strong ACK.
> 
> That only happens when the default is at the Debian Installer /
> tasksel level.
> 
> e.g. a change of default desktop for d-i only affects new d-i
> installs.
> 
> A change of default compiler version *regularly* affects any existing
> setup which has build-essential installed and this is 100% correct.
> 
> Nobody wants their pbuilder / schroot build environments stuck on an
> old version of the compiler - nor does anyone actually want to
> require manual intervention to go from gcc-4.8 to gcc-4.9 - that's
> what we have the gcc package.
> 
> Same is true for the default python interpreter or various other
> default packages rather than "package selections" via tasksel or d-i.

There is a considerable difference, however, between automatically
installing the new version of a program (even if in a different package
for whatever reason) and automatically installing a completely different
program from the original, simply because both programs are intended for
the same role.

You could argue that it's appropriate to do anyway - e.g. that it would
be appropriate to automatically switch existing systems from gcc to
clang if the default compiler referenced by build-essential got changed.
It still shouldn't be treated as the same thing as a simple version
upgrade, however.

- --
   The Wanderer

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.

A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=eyxN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: