On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:05:11AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Ghostscript have changed its license from GPL-3+ to AGPL-3+ since > version 9.07. I guess given that GPL-3+ would've been a problem in itself already and given that GPL-3 and AGPL-3 are compatible, that there can't be that many problems left. > Seems that these projects may link against Ghostscript, and therefore > (possibly) effectively becomes AGPL-3+ with this change: > > * gimp > * texlive-bin (texlive-binaries) > * libspectre (libspectre1) > * cantor > * evas-loaders (libevas-loaders) > * efl (libevas1, libecore-evas1, libecore-imf1, libecore-input1, > libedje-bin, libedje1, libemotion1, libethumb-client1, > libethumb1, libevas1-engine-fb, libevas1-engines-core, > libevas1-engines-x) > * e17 > * exactimage (edisplay) > * enna > * intone > * edbus (libedbus1) > * elementary (libelementary1, libelementary-bin) > * python-edbus > * libphone-ui-shr > * phoneuid > * evince (libevdocument3-4, evince, gir1.2-evince-3.0, libevview3-3, > evince-gtk) > * denemo > * gnome-documents > * gnome-sushi > * sugar-browse-activity > * okular > * qpdfview-ps-plugin > * zathura-ps > * gle-graphics Does that mean that people calling one of these from a script or a web service (e.g. invoices using texlive-bin) will need to adhere to the AGPL as well? Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature