Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging
From: Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:09:24 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140214190924.GB6428@bryant.redmars.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnlfs1fm.2tf.jmm@inutil.org>
References: <[🔎] 8761oitb88.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] slrnlfs1fm.2tf.jmm@inutil.org>

Moritz, what's the security team's opinion on ffmpeg being reintroduced
as a binary package (providing /usr/bin/ffmpeg) only?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging
  - From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

References:
- Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging
  - From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Ubuntu will switch to systemd
Next by Date: Re: anyone interested in cobbler?
Previous by thread: Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging
Next by thread: Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread