Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

To: "debian-devel@lists.debian.org" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status
From: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:42:36 +0000
Message-id: <CANBHLUiqY53hiFZ1yKRYb=X6kN-BuDkcDSNFi1+YMsMpBq6LFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <20131128200456.7097820103F18@thykier.net>
References: <20131128200456.7097820103F18@thykier.net>

On 28 November 2013 20:04, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote:
>  * Architecture Status
>    * ia64 in danger
>    * sparc/ppc/mips/kfreebsd at risk
>    * s390 dropped from testing

Is "ppc" - powerpc or ppc64?
Is ppc64 looking healthy enought to become a release architecture for jessie?
What about x32? Is it going to become a release architecture for jessie?

-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status
  - From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME
Next by Date: Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status
Previous by thread: Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status
Next by thread: Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread