[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First autoremovals happen in about 8 days



Hi,

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:53:35PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >>    gwyddion: bugs 713565, flagged for removal in 8.3 days
> > 
> > Hmmm, that's really strange.  The bug report was closed
> > 
> >    Sat, 29 Jun 2013 13:07:42 +0200
> > 
> > Seems something is wrong with the script.
> > 
> 
> I am more inclined to believe that you experienced one of the quirks of
> the Debian BTS.  According to the BTS, it is:
> 
> """
> Fixed in version src:gwyddion/2.28-2
> """
> 
> In the bottom of the bug log you will find:
> 
> """
> No longer marked as found in versions gwyddion/2.28-2
> """
> 
> meaning that the bug was (or, rather, used to be) marked as "fixed" in
> the same version as it was "found".  The BTS handles this by *silently
> ignoring the fixed version* and thus concluding the bug is still in
> 2.28-2.  It then hands that off to Britney and the auto-removal script,
> which will consider 2.28-2 as buggy as well.

Ahhh, I was missing this somehow.  I rebuilded the current package
2.32-2 in testing and unstable without any problem and thus closed
the bug (now hopefully for all versions).

> > rendering the BTS page.  While the first bug (#709190) is mentioned
> > the second one (#713284) is missing on the BTS page:
> > 
> >    http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=r-other-mott-happy
> > 
> > Any explanation for this?
> > 
> 
> Well, they are merged into each other and thus the BTS decided only to
> show one of them in the bug page.  However, both bugs appear when you
> reference then directly via [1] and [2].

Hmm, OK, I have noticed the merge.  However, the BTS behaviour seems to
be new to me.  But thinking about it it is reasonable.

Thanks for all your release team work

     Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: