Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:59:26AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Summary table:
> > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
> > ---------------++-----++---------++-------++------
> [...]
> > sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 || 1
> >
> > [2] By the looks of it, if sparc was replaced by sparc64, we could be
> > looking at 3 in the "Other"-column rather than 0.
>
> In addition gcc no longer supports 32bit sparc according to the
> architecture qualification notes for Squeeze[1] and Wheezy[2].
I would still like to see some proofs of this claim, as already asked
multiple times.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: