[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Results of the porter roll call (Was: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing)



On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:59:26AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Summary table:
> > Arch           || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
> > ---------------++-----++---------++-------++------
> [...]
> > sparc[2]       ||  1  ||       0 ||     0 ||    1
> > 
> > [2] By the looks of it, if sparc was replaced by sparc64, we could be
> > looking at 3 in the "Other"-column rather than 0.
> 
> In addition gcc no longer supports 32bit sparc according to the
> architecture qualification notes for Squeeze[1] and Wheezy[2].

I would still like to see some proofs of this claim, as already asked
multiple times.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net


Reply to: