[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



Dominique Dumont <dod@debian.org> schrieb:
>On Wednesday 02 October 2013 16:05:18 Dominik George wrote:
>> >You should use a version derived from the date only. This way, you
>> >won't be in
>> >trouble if upstream switches to git.
>>
>> I absolutely do not see why this should be an issue.
>
>well, you proposed a version like 'hgXXXX'. if upstream switches to
>git, you
>can't use a version like 'gitYYYY' because it sorts before hg. I grant
>you
>that is easy to work around.

If you deem it unlikely that two commits are made in the same day (which happens all the time), how likely is it that upstream switches VCSs and does an important commit on the same day?

- -nik
.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8-fdroid

iQFNBAEBCgA3BQJSTDLdMBxEb21pbmlrIEdlb3JnZSAobW9iaWxlIGtleSkgPG5p
a0BuYXR1cmFsbmV0LmRlPgAKCRAvLbGk0zMOJZcSB/0Y0qa176+WM6I+lR+62QUY
lEN9SW1gAAUpz5NV+1UJlqbgIz8VbxvHVEXcfAtVhYqVzYdQ6XLrbAHwAuQb7lKK
ge7iV0GGLRlBJl97n9c5gqNMKCScEkVG4d1nDO4rn1o/7ghBfaz+yGlFt9woODQn
ByDGB907Ng9fF7FrQ+rn+XH6ROI0OQBbDDNFTUEpst3lLoaVuMUxXUWQKimt0Kcq
6rVwhA5itJFA59zOufxME2OuUJe5surrfnhJApDZq2+Rzsy0E6PuwGCr8qtzepER
B5uZ9BqVPEUj0UdMty9YreZnz2oNNUgifM2IKg7je5ZmVo7qsh10Opl1Y/68bkr4
=bC2y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: