[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports



On 18 July 2013 21:14, Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote:
> Thomas Goirand (2013-07-19):
>> So that brings me to ask: do you have an idea of how much work it would
>> be to have Upstart ported to kFreeBSD or Hurd (even if that would mean
>> loosing some of the functionality (obviously cgroups comes to mind))?
>
> Surely, you could have tried “porting upstart kfreebsd” in your favorite
> search engine, and you would have found Scott's mail from 2009 addressing
> that particular question. Right?
>
>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2009/07/msg00122.html
>

And this was pondered again not that long ago:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01227.html

I see that 9.1 and 10 kernels are available in experimental so an
upstart port to kfreebsd can be approached.

Regards,

Dmitrijs.


Reply to: