[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 7.0-> 7.1: any reasons for switching from {4,5,6}.0.x scheme?



On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Neil McGovern 2013-06-17 <20130617111457.GG22521@halon.org.uk>
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 04:32:47PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> > > Many were curious on diaspora about the change[1]. There is no
> > > rationale given in release news[2] about this change. Was there some
> > > major change in this release or did we change the version scheme? Any
> > > pointers would be welcome.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Given that the middle '0' was redundant, and we now do X.0 for all
> > major releases, it was simply removed.
> 
> #712586
> 

So... why is postgres relying on an undocumented numbering schema, and
breaking when it doesn't match what it expects?

Neil
-- 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: