On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:08:21PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > This is utter bullshit and you should already know it. Systemd is much > more reliable as a whole than any other implementation. I have yet to > see a use case where it is not better. It is not better if you don't want proprietary binary-format logs in /var/log with no documented way to turn them off. It is also not better if you want an init that does not dump its own log messages to LOG_KERN. As a reasonably sane person, it had never occurred to me to put non-kernel logs under LOG_KERN for any reason whatsoever. For better or for worse, sysvinit provides a lot of modularity. systemd provides none of that modularity, and there are a lot of things it does that I'd rather disable (or better yet, uninstall) because they're just wrong. When I've used upstart and sysvinit, I've never had functionality that I wanted to disable and remove. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature