Re: jessie release goals

[Mark Symonds <mark@syminet.com>]

On May 12, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> wrote:

> +++ Daniel Schepler [2013-05-12 09:19 -0700]:
>>   On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Matthias Klose <[1]doko@debian.org>
>>   wrote:
>> 
>>     �- find a solution that GCC's b-d's may not be installable anymore with
>>     � �the current approach to binNMUs.
>> 
>>   OK, that's a good point that I hadn't thought of before.� So, it does make
>>   sense to keep libc6-i386 and lib32gcc1 if only for cross-architecture
>>   version skew issues.� But I also think for most users it would make sense
>>   to allow for the option of satisfying gcc-multilib's dependencies using
>>   multiarch, 


Here's an idea:  

Can we keep the distribution simple enough for nearly anyone to understand?  

-- 
Mark