Re: epoch fix?
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:16:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 05:04 +0000, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Michael Biebl wrote :
> > > The usage of really (...) that you don't have to fix all r-deps to include
> > > the the epoch in the Build-Depends.
> > Why would adding an epoch cause the need for adding the epoch in the
> > build-dependent packages ?
> Because otherwise these build-dependent packages will not bring the
> version they actually need?
> You know, what build-dependencies are for.
I know what build-dependencies are for, thank you. :-) The question is why
epoch would need more updating of Build-Depends than with the "really"
approach. I'm missing Michael Biebl's point.