Re: R 3.0.0 and required rebuilds of all reverse Depends: of R
On 2013-04-15 15:31:38 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > So, transitions could be avoided in a social way. No need for a freeze.
> Let's see how well that works - look at the very first message in this
My point is that: whether there is a freeze or not, it doesn't work
On the other hand, one could argue that without the freeze system,
it could have worked better: here the maintainer may have thought
that because of the freeze, uploading the package wouldn't have
hurt the next release.
Vincent Lefèvre <firstname.lastname@example.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)