Re: socket-based activation has unmaintainable security?

To: Thomas Hood <jdthood@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: socket-based activation has unmaintainable security?
From: Shawn <shawnlandden@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:41:50 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAJusiZUjKP_nv96HNCmUFyNRUkyYW+1Y1JPtpCMC4hoTip3Yaw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5110DCEC.4010405@gmail.com>
References: <20121114204711.GA9158@virgil.dodds.net> <[🔎] 5110DCEC.4010405@gmail.com>

socket-activation in systemd _helps_ security in that you can give an unprivlidged process a listening port under 1024. (using a privileged configuration file)

-Shawn Landden

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: socket-based activation has unmaintainable security?
  - From: Martin Wuertele <maxx@debian.org>

References:
- socket-based activation has unmaintainable security?
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Go (golang) packaging, part 2
Next by Date: Re: Go (golang) packaging, part 2
Previous by thread: socket-based activation has unmaintainable security?
Next by thread: Re: socket-based activation has unmaintainable security?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread