[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Backports upgrade policy (ButAutomaticUpdates:yes)

also sprach Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org> [2013.01.25.2001 +1300]:
> > Setting ButAutomaticUpdates certainly doesn't have enough pros to
> > warrant this change, just like that. The way it was before does have
> > a huge pro though: it's the way it's been for years. You know, never
> > change a winning team…
> the feature was introduced 08/2006 [1], which means is as old as
> backports without the flag.

NotAutomatic was, but I was talking about ButAutomaticUpdates, which
was introduced more than four years later.

 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
i'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Reply to: