[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GFDL in main



On 02/12/2012 05:16, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 1 December 2012 15:42, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
> <jean-christophe.dubacq@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>> On 01/12/2012 12:10, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>> These packages include documentation licensed under GFDL with Invariant
>>> Sections or Cover Texts:
>>>
>>> bash
>>> binutils
>>> tar
>>>
>>> As per GR 2006-001 such works are not suitable for main:
>>> http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
>>>
>>> Any volunteers to file bugs?
>>
>>
>> Yes, exactly what we needed: file a RC bug against essential packages at
>> this point of release :)
>>
> 
> Yes, this _is_ exactly what we need.
> 
> "1. Debian will remain 100% free" [1]
> 
> And we better not release until licensing problems in main are resolved.

Weren't the JSON licensing issues to be ignored for Wheezy, or am I mistaken
about this?

> [...]

-- 
Kind regards,
Loong Jin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: