Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:08:18PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> >>
>> >> * Package name : double-conversion
>> >
>> > libjs-double-conversion would be more appropriate, since
>> > this is a javascript library. double-conversion is too
>> > generic.
>>
>> It's actually written in C++, not JS, so I don't think the libjs prefix
>> is appropriate.
>>
>> The name "double-conversion" is taken from upstream, but I agree that it
>> is quite generic. I don't have any better idea, but suggestions are
>> welcome.
>
> Sorry, misread the description there. In that case, libdoubleconversion
> would be better for the binary packages (though the source package name
> doesn't need changing).
Sure. I plan to use libdouble-conversion{,-dev,-dbg} (I prefer to keep
the hyphen in the binary package name, unless this is bad practice).
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
pgpr_cuDOuT2N.pgp
Description: PGP signature