Re: Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)
From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:42:57 +0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20121011184257.GE5888@belkar.wrar.name>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20121011181855.GA8645@roeckx.be>
References: <[🔎] 1349911198.3341.117.camel@fermat.scientia.net> <[🔎] 20121011181855.GA8645@roeckx.be>

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:18:55PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> There are also the md5sums files that are stored in the .deb file.
> I'm not really sure what the real use case for them is and
> wouldn't have a problem with them going away.
debsums(1) aka "what packages on my system are corrupt by a recent FS
failure"

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

References:
- Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)
  - From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
- Re: Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

Prev by Date: Re: (seemingly) declinging bug report numbers
Next by Date: Re: (seemingly) declinging bug report numbers
Previous by thread: Re: Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)
Next by thread: Re: Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread