Re: Lets (eventually) find a good solution for /tmp
On Monday 11 June 2012 16:01:10 Aneurin Price wrote:
> On 10 June 2012 19:31, Thomas Goirand <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On 06/11/2012 12:06 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >> swap file on / [...] is
> >> really the direction that we should be going
> > NO !
> > Does this need to be explained? :/
> Not quite sure what you're objecting to. If you are against the use of
> swap files rather than swap partitions then yes, it does need to be
> explained, because as far as I am aware a swap file is the better
> choice in virtually all situations (and is what I've been using
> exclusively since Linux 2.6 removed the downsides).
data point: a swap file would not work with btrfs .
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>