[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#666541: marked as done ([Wish] package OpenSearch descriptions for reuse by all browsers)

Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2012 11:04:38 +0200
with message-id <201205281104.39421.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line this ain't a general problem
has caused the Debian Bug report #666541,
regarding [Wish] package OpenSearch descriptions for reuse by all browsers
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
666541: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666541
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: general
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I'd like to see a package like "opensearch-descriptions" in Debian containing a
comprehensive database of opensearch description documents. Browser packages
should depend on this package to provide a consistent set of opensearch
providers.

Not all search engines contained in the package should be included by default in
all browsers. The package should rather provide a mechanism to select and
deselect individual search engines system wide or for a user account.

Databases of opensearch descriptions:

 * http://mycroft.mozdev.org
 * http://www.searchplugins.net

The package should also provide support for extension-packages, that provide
additional search engines.

Thomas Koch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=2te3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Thomas,

this ain't a general problem, it's also not an ITP or RTP, but as I understand 
it, rather a wish that someone does something^w^writes some application / 
database.

Definitly not a general problem in or for Debian, thus closing.


cheers,
	Holger

--- End Message ---
Reply to: