[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs makes it useful



On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:47:37PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >>> /tmp               8,0G          60M  8,0G            1% /tmp
> >>> Does this count as "large files"?
> >>> As "a lot of small-only files"?
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> Exactly how is this a practical explanation and example? :/
> >> Are you saying that in *your case* /tmp is almost unused?
> >>     
> > I'm saying that 60M is a substantial amount which still may be not called
> > "large".
> >   
> Try playing a 2h video with flash, and see that 60 MB isn't enough...
Enough for what? 60 Mb is used space, not total space. And how is that
relevant to my question anyway?

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: