Re: upstart: please update to latest upstream version
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: upstart: please update to latest upstream version
- From: David Weinehall <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:05:34 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120303210533.GC17161@suiko.acc.umu.se>
- Mail-followup-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <20120225223820.GF24903@mraw.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20120226091920.GG2385@mails.so.argh.org> <1330257918.15681.1.camel@tomoyo> <1330259205.15681.6.camel@tomoyo> <email@example.com>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:36:11PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes ("Re: upstart: please update to latest upstream version"):
> > Or, as has been said countless times otherwise: kFreeBSD should not
> > hinder the improvement of the Linux ports.
> It's not just kFreeBSD. Accepting systemd, in the current state,
> means permanently tying ourselves to the Linux kernel.
> The Linux kernel project has some serious and ongoing structural
> problems and I think it's very important that as a project we keep our
> options open.
I'd be very curious to hear what these serious and ongoing structural
Kind regards: David Weinehall
/) David Weinehall <firstname.lastname@example.org> /) Rime on my window (\
// ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/