Re: leaks in our only-signed-software fortress

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: leaks in our only-signed-software fortress
From: Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:14:34 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 8762f4cmh1.fsf@deep-thought.43-1.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120218113214.GA2013@jwilk.net> (Jakub Wilk's message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:32:14 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 0763775752c72b696283491568e04907@scientia.net> <[🔎] 20120218113214.GA2013@jwilk.net>

Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> writes:
> Could you point us to those which were ignored or denied?

At least pbuilder still disables secure APT by default, see #579028.

Regards
Ansgar

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: leaks in our only-signed-software fortress
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

References:
- leaks in our only-signed-software fortress
  - From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
- Re: leaks in our only-signed-software fortress
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: leaks in our only-signed-software fortress
Next by Date: Bug#660341: ITP: ruby-kgio -- Kinder, gentler I/O for Ruby
Previous by thread: Re: leaks in our only-signed-software fortress
Next by thread: Re: leaks in our only-signed-software fortress
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread