Re: Help (voodoo, really) needed [Re: failed i386 build of iceweasel 11.0~b1-2]
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:40:28PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Mike Hommey, le Fri 17 Feb 2012 18:36:56 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:23:00PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Mike Hommey, le Fri 17 Feb 2012 18:09:37 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > > sydney_audio_alsa.c:504:5: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> > > >
> > > > Would anyone have a clue as to what the hell is happening?
> > >
> > > Unpacking liboss4-salsa-dev (from .../liboss4-salsa-dev_4.2-build2005-2_armel.deb) ...
> > > Selecting previously unselected package libtinfo-dev.
> > >
> > > I don't know why the buildds preferred liboss4-salsa-dev over
> > > libasound2-dev.
> > >
> > > In my previous packaging of oss4's alsa-over-OSS emulation, I had only
> > > enabled the -dev in the non-linux archs. In the current packaging, it's
> > > enabled in all of them. I've now restricted it in oss4 too. Oss4
> > > packagers, any opinion against it?
> > Oh, so OSS4 provides an Alsa API that is not compatible with Alsa's.
> It *is* compatible. With an older version of the API, which used void
So, it's compatible with an API that is older than Alsa v1.0.10rc1,
released 7 years ago. What is surprising, however, is that Alsa didn't
change its soname for the resulting ABI change...
*sigh* library authors.