Re: Comments on introducing a new Essential package: base-init?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 09.02.2012 13:09, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 09.02.2012 11:50, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:03:27PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>>> sysvinit is currently Essential.
>>
>> Why do we need an init as essential anyway? It is used in all
>> real systems, but not chroots or other special systems. This
>> makes it similar to the kernel, which does not even have a high
>> priority.
not objecting the idea by itself, please bear in mind this would turn
thousands of packages RC buggy immediately, as they all need to
declare a dependency against (an) init script given they rely on a
init script for functionality then.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=LZA3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: