Re: Best practice for cleaning autotools-generated files?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Best practice for cleaning autotools-generated files?
- From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 09:44:19 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110509074419.GA2467@nibiru.local>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Reply-to: weigelt@metux.de
- In-reply-to: <87r588tj6h.fsf@qurzaw.varnish-software.com>
- References: <20110316092035.249c8cf7.codehelp@debian.org> <20110316193506.GF7918@khazad-dum.debian.net> <AANLkTi=pd6spiKn41GjL5p7xMhEdQWSxDu1QgAh9CBc+@mail.gmail.com> <20110317130818.GA1724@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20110507125017.GD25423@nibiru.local> <20110507191840.GA31596@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20110507195421.GA25222@nibiru.local> <87sjsp643z.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <20110508194331.GI25423@nibiru.local> <87r588tj6h.fsf@qurzaw.varnish-software.com>
* Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> schrieb:
> ]] Enrico Weigelt
>
> | Autoconf (w/o automake) offers no means to tell additional m4
> | include pathes (eg. in configure.ac), so that just calling
> | autoreconf (w/o any additional parameters!) can do a full
> | regeneration all on its own.
>
> What's wrong with the suggestion in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00442.html ?
>
> If that doesn't work, that sounds like a bug in autoconf.
Ah, I probably misread this posting in the way that automake
is required. thx for the tip, I'll investigate.
cu
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: