Re: A few observations about systemd
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Gergely Nagy <algernon@balabit.hu> wrote:
>>> What if next year $upstream_of_an_important_package decides that he only
>>> cares about amd64 and arm? The rest of the world is obsolete anyway...
>>
>> What about also embeded marked ? Projection says what consumer will
>> use more embeded software than desktop in the next years.
>> Systemd seems pretty non modular and too heavy weight for this, at
>> least for now.
>
> It's actually lighter than sysvinit, from what I've seen so far, but my
> experiences are fairly limited.
See depends. At least it could use dlopen and fall back
Bastien
> Furthermore, on embedded systems where it doesn't make sense to use
> systemd, most probably sysvinit makes even less sense, and they're using
> a custom init anyway.
>
> But I'm not an embedded guy, the closest thing I have is my router,
> which is using busybox's init, to the best of my knowledge.
>
> --
> |8]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 87vcuzhkt8.fsf@balabit.hu">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 87vcuzhkt8.fsf@balabit.hu
>
>
Reply to: