Le dimanche 17 juillet 2011 à 13:54 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek a écrit : > Systemd is bloated > Systemd is layered strangely > Systemd hard-wires special cases > Systemd deprecates shell scripts I disagree these are real, practical issues - some of these aren’t even problems but features. > Systemd is Linux-specific > Systemd's author is annoying Developing for Linux-only is fine, but Lennart has explicitly said that he wouldn’t remotely consider accepting portability patches, which goes further than any other piece of free software I had to deal with. We need one and only one init system in Debian. (Those considering maintaining several init systems in parallel do not see how stupid, bloated and error-prone it would be to require all daemon maintainers to maintain more init scripts than they do now.) I’d like to see systemd as that one init system, but this challenges the future of kfreebsd. If kfreebsd is really more than a toy operating system and we want users to do something with it, the porters need to maintain a kfreebsd branch of a modern init system (be it upstart or systemd). -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part