[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#633795: ITP: evolution-tray -- Plugin for Evolution to put it in notification area



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 14.07.2011 10:48, Max Tsepkov wrote:
> Until it fixed I'll add
> Breaks: gnome (>=3)
> to not use deprecated features.

this sounds like a very bad idea. Even if such a package would exist, it
would be a meta package to install /actual/ Gnome 3 packages. Moreover
you don't actually break as by definition of the policy [1].

Presuming your package works on Gnome 2 /only/, depend with a versioned
dependency declaring a <=/<< relation [2] on the actual package
providing the tray area container in Gnome 2. I can't believe Gnome 3
wouldn't support older legacy tray widgets though, I'd assume it would,
similar to KDE 4, supports older tray widgets through some legacy wrapping.

[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-breaks
[2]
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-depsyntax

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=ATh5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: