Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2011, 14:07 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> Joachim Breitner writes ("Re: Order of dpkg triggers [and 1 more messages]"):
> > Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2011, 12:50 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> > > Would it be possible for ghc-doc to update the cache too ? Then
> > > presumably the call in ghc would have no work to do and would be fast.
> >
> > yes, that would be a possibility. If the Depends: does not work as Joss
> > said, then I?ll try this.
>
> I didn't say this before - perhaps I should have - but: I don't think
> you should be adding an incorrect Depends just to deal with this
> ordering problem. Installing the docs without the program is normally
> a reasonable thing to do.
technically, we do already depend on ghc, but for other reasons and only
indirectly via another package, so it wouldn’t be a big deal in this
case.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part