Hello Jon Dowland,
Am 2011-04-11 12:02:09, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> And you wouldn't be - because, once again - you are not forced to use whatever
> the default solution is, you have the freedom to switch to another, just like
> people who currently *do* use network-manager have taken advantage of.
WILL be there a choice to install ifupdownd instead of NM?
And what about automated instalations?
I think, DI has to support a Fast-Install-Option for Desktop and Server
where the first one installs NM by default and the second one IFUPDOWND.
> We are really going around and around with the same set of misconceptions and
> misunderstandings. Please carefully read the thread again before re-iterating
> any more mistakes!
This thread is talking about "network-manager as default" which is
definitively no go.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack
Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.can4linux.org/>
Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ #328449886
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature