[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Default Homedir Permissions

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:55:16AM -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
> > 0755 is not inherently insecure.  Others can't make any changes, but
> > they can look.  The only issue here is accidental disclosure of
> > information intended to be private. 
> If public by default is the way we want to go, then why not have a
> Private folder be default in the users home directory? Combined with the
> indication emblem in nautilus; this might provide a space for users to
> put data. ATM it's too hard to teach users how to secure a folder or
> even how to set up an encrypted folder.

I think this is an excellent idea, because the presence of a "private"
folder in the user's home implicitly implies that the rest of the
home is /not/ private, i.e. is self-documenting.  We could even put
a README file inside explaining what the purpose is, and how to change
the permissions should they want to.

We could even do the opposite (create a "public" folder) if the
permissions are 0750, though this would require either 0751 or
ACLs to be actually accessible.  Again, we could include a README file
instructing the user how to do this.

The Nautilus emblems idea is, I think, a fairly straightforward
exercise should we wish to do this.  I already puts "no entry" emblems
on folders you don't have permission to enter, so it's not a big
change to additionally flag up folders which other have read and write
access to.


  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: