Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:59:46PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
> > I favor a combination of idea one and two, which is: Keep 3.5 in
> > unstable and push the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push 4.0 to
> > unstable when it's out.
> > Then we have one big break and a tested 4.0 in unstable.
> I’d favor that one too. The sooner we can adapt reverse dependencies to
> 4.0 in experimental, the better. And no need to do the work twice.
There have been almost a year to adapt reverse dependencies to 3.6 in
experimental. And I don't think most rdeps are ready for 3.6. Do you
expect things to be significantly different?