[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processed (with 66 errors): Please change me email address



Hi,

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Javier Barroso <javibarroso@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>
>>> Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
>>>
>>> > submitter 341249 javibarroso@gmail.com
>>> Failed to set submitter on 341249: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive.
>> [..]
>>
>> And another hundred more such requests.
>>
>>> > submitter 585770 javibarroso@gmail.com
>>> Bug #585770 {Done: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>} [linux-2.6] a collection of NULL pointer dereference  [ipv6 and vlans?]
>>> Bug #584221 {Done: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>} [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel panic in 2.6.32-5 when bridge config is present in /etc/network/interfaces
>>> Bug #591186 {Done: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>} [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel panic with 2.6.32-5 and e1000 and vlan interface enabled
>>> Bug #591473 {Done: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>} [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: kernel panics on reboot or when nic has no link
>>> Changed Bug submitter to 'javibarroso@gmail.com' from 'Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>'
>>
>> Maybe you could think for a second next time you do something broken
>> like this.
>>
>> Not appreciated at all.
> I'm really sorry for that. This is my second mail to debian-devel, and
> seems like both were failed :(
>
> I failed to understand bugs.debian.org site.
>
> My process was:
>
> 1. Search my bugs in b.d.o though
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=both&submitter=myoldaddress
> 2. Send email with submitter instruction to control@b.d.o
Here is my error, I didn't notice about merged links in this report

Sorry again wasting your time.

I sent other command request to change submitters from that merged
bugs to original.

Again ... next time I four recheck before doing the wrong way

Thank you


Reply to: