Re: [RESENT] Re: Xen for Squeeze, 3.4 or 4.0

To: pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RESENT] Re: Xen for Squeeze, 3.4 or 4.0
From: Łukasz Oleś <lukaszoles@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:29:20 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] AANLkTil0pDsnZZOXhz7h29vgCHihvPOvXQg5aDSHc4uM@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100610155858.GA13318@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 20100610155428.GA12754@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <[🔎] 20100610155858.GA13318@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>

2010/6/10 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>:
>> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.

I completely agree. Probably more people will use pvops kernel with
4.0 instead 3.4, so hopefully it will be better tested.

-- 
Łukasz Oleś

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] [RESENT] Re: Xen for Squeeze, 3.4 or 4.0
  - From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>

References:
- Xen for Squeeze, 3.4 or 4.0
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- [RESENT] Re: Xen for Squeeze, 3.4 or 4.0
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: ITP: libdata-formvalidator-constraints-datetime-perl -- D::FV constraints for dates and times
Next by Date: Re: A lot of pending packages
Previous by thread: [RESENT] Re: Xen for Squeeze, 3.4 or 4.0
Next by thread: Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] [RESENT] Re: Xen for Squeeze, 3.4 or 4.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread