Re: Re (2): lilo removal in squeeze / new lilo upstream
On: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 17:44:05 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
> "Joachim Wiedorn" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I see that more people than thought still want to have or need LiLO.
>> Now I have decided to start and reanimate the upstream development.
>> Everyone is invited to join in this development. I'm working on LiLO
>> version 23. Shortly with more informations ...
> Have fun. When you have a release that actually has merit, it can be
> reconsidered for inclusion in Debian.
What is your definition of "merit", William? And why does
the current release not have it?
> In the meantime, the original plan continues.
The original plan was based on false assumptions. Why would you
continue with a plan based on false assumptions? We now have a
release of lilo with (a) an active upstream maintainer, and (b) no
release critical bugs. If you simply don't want to be a Debian
package maintainer for lilo anymore, why not ask for volunteers to
take over for you?
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :