Re: libgcrypt brain dead?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:49:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100320204940.GA6982@bongo.bofh.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87aau2u40o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
References: <[🔎] 3c5cf5261003081534s5202413dw4d93c80db1a30150@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.1003201039320.25150@hygvzn-guhyr.pnirva.bet> <[🔎] 87fx3ubytu.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 1269115142.18314.108.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 87aau2u40o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>

On Mar 20, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:

> My understanding is that that's not the standard that Debian has
> historically applied,
This is not my understanding as well.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- libgcrypt brain dead?
  - From: Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
- Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
  - From: Richard A Nelson <cowboy@debian.org>
- Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
Next by Date: Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
Previous by thread: Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
Next by thread: Re: libgcrypt brain dead?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread