Re: dh_config_model_upgrade: package upgrade with Config::Model
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> wrote:
> | As is adding a perl dependency to packages that have no previous need
> | for perl.
>
> *shrug*, unless you're talking about embedded systems, which are of
> course free to patch their way out of this some other way, most systems
> will have perl anyway. You well know that perl-base is Essential: yes
> and not taking advantage of the tools we have is silly.
It would still be nice if the postinst snippets didn't have to be
patched for EmDebian. I imagine this would simply mean checking for
perl in the postinst and only performing configuration upgrades when
it is available.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: