Re: Lintian based autorejects
Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
> On a second read of the proposal, it occurred to me (and a handful of
> other DDs in private communications agreed) that the above naming choice
> of "warning" and "error" can be a bit unfortunate. In fact, lintian
> already has its own notion of warning/error and having the naming
> overloaded by dak messages that are based on lintian outcome can be
> quite confusing.
ACK
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
Reply to: