Re: Bug#545691: diverting telinit
On Tue, Oct 27 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 05:41:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > In article <[🔎] 87r5sudn0p.fsf_-_@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> you wrote:
>> >> [ "$(stat -c %d/%i /sbin/init)" = "$(stat -Lc %d/%i /proc/1/exe 2>/dev/null)" ] ; then
>> >> # So, init exists, and there is a linuxy /proc, and the inode of
>> >> # the executable of the process with uid 1 is the same as
>> >> # /sbin/init (ok, no init=/bin/sh going on)
>
>> > Maybe another check besides inode idendity is better, otherwise it will not
>> > be able to be used afer an upgrade (and before reboot), or?
>
>> Not needed. If init has been just upgraded, it has been already
>> told to init -u itself.
>
> This does not appear to be true for upstart, which it's planned to switch to
> on Linux for squeeze.
Well, I guess we shall have to use other means (invoke-rc.d?)
to have upstart re-exec itself. Does upstart provide other means for
that?
manoj
--
A little suffering is good for the soul. Kirk, "The Corbomite Maneuver",
stardate 1514.0
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: