Re: Bug#545691: diverting telinit
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:40:56AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:43:18PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I created a elaborate test case tos ee if we are in a chroot, if
> > not if /proc/1 is actually /sbin/init, and that telinit exists (example
> > below).
> Why are they not able to ignore the errors from telinit? All checked
> packages uses this to ask init to reexecute itself and free old library
> references. Nothing in this is critical to the usability of the packages
> themself or the system.
Oh, and this could be made even easier by defining file-based triggers
in the package providing init instead of doing it in all the
dependencies.
Bastian
--
Phasers locked on target, Captain.
Reply to: