Re: Release goal: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Julien Cristau (jcristau@debian.org) [090825 21:05]:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 20:55:04 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> 
> > * Julien Cristau (jcristau@debian.org) [090825 12:18]:
> > > You should exclude anything that isn't /usr/lib IMO.
> > 
> > And not /lib and not /lib{32,64} and not /usr/lib{32,64}, ...
> > 
> /lib shouldn't contain any libtool file (just like it doesn't contain
> the .so symlinks)

Just that alone 37 packages depend on /lib/libacl.la. That's why I'm
not feeling so happy to restrict to /usr/lib.


Cheers,
Andi