On Mon,20.Oct.08, 00:51:03, s. keeling wrote: > Just curious, but why 2 & 3? Why isn't 1 considered the simplest > solution? xterm is ca. 300k. What Seyon users can't afford 300k disk > space or its RSS? > > vi's installed on every *nix box on the planet. Why shouldn't xterm > be on every X install on the planet? My /usr/bin/vim.basic is 1.3 Mb. > > 1 seems a far more robust solution to me. Because it brings benefits to all users, not just users of seyon. I recently went (again) through experimenting with different terminal emulators and it was pretty annoying that all my keyboard shortcuts (based on x-terminal-emulator!) didn't work because one or the other wouldn't support some command-line options. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature