Re: Let's restart from scratch the gr_lenny vote (in a better form this time)?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 20:33, Bernhard R. Link <email@example.com> wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi <firstname.lastname@example.org> [081218 18:11]:
>> But that will delay even further Lenny release;
> Hey! You suggested to redo something. Thus you are suggesting to delay.
But maybe with the aim of a better target?
>> I think that a simple
>> vote like the one dato proposed is what is needed to let us move
>> forward a release.
> Please note that changing the vote changes the output.
and don't we want it? don't we want to know if we can release lenny
with blobs or release without it (just to make an example)?
> And while the
> current vote might be strange, the simplified vote only makes sense if
> you want a very specific outcome, thus is much worse and extremly
ehm? what? how is it un-democratic to have different votes for
different things, targetted exactly to decide where something is
allowed or not? the specific outcome I want it to be sure that
whatever the ballot results will be, we then know *exactly* what to do
for lenny, something I don't believe it could be archive with the
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi