Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results
From: Cyril Brulebois <cyril.brulebois@enst-bretagne.fr>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:19:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080128131905.GF1240@evy.ikibiki.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080128062309.GB3413@blop.info>
References: <[🔎] 20080125142515.GA18104@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] 20080127014725.GA4622@cloud.net.au> <[🔎] 20080128062309.GB3413@blop.info>

On 28/01/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Build-Conflicts: libwxgtk2.6-dev?

I thought we were moving away from wx 2.4, not from 2.6. ;-)

-- 
Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: pgpWTKCQ5_9Wi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>

Prev by Date: Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results
Next by Date: Re: Standard to indicate repacking in version numbers?
Previous by thread: Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results
Next by thread: Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread