Re: Handling of poorly maintained and useless packages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Some additional info might also be useful:
>> - age of last upload
>> - WNPP status (O, RFH, RFA) (for how long?)
>> - Maintainer's MIA status
>> - number of packages maintained by the maintainer
>> - number of maintainers for the package
>> - is the package team maintained?
> - are there better maintained packages with similar functionality?
- - upstream status: dead, unresponsive, very active (since useless
packages can become useful very fast in the case of new software),
ACK to all the rest.
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----