On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:16:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:47:40AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > It might help to do something like use the confirmed tag to flag reports > > which can readily be reproduced or which otherwise don't need the > > submitter to confirm them. This would mean that those bugs could be > Confirmed is not versionned. The fact that it was confirmed at one > point does not means that the bug is still here. In that regard, using > "found" with the proper version is better, as it tracks versions, and > can more efficientely prevent new pings when no new upstream was > released. You're missing the point here. What I said was that it would be an idea to use this for "bugs which can readily be reproduced or or which otherwise don't need the submitter to confirm them" and that this means that there is no need to ping the submitter to confirm that they are present in a given version. Doing this would allow pings to be done more intelligently - most of the times people get annoyed with mass pings it seems to be because they've been pinged about some trivially reproducible bug. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Description: Digital signature