Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny? -- cupsys?
- To: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>, pkg-cups-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Masayuki Hatta <mhatta@grad.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>, Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Subject: Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny? -- cupsys?
- From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:58:43 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070815125843.GA18567@debian.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>, pkg-cups-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Masayuki Hatta <mhatta@grad.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>, Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 46C22801.6000007@debian.org>
- References: <[🔎] 46C22801.6000007@debian.org>
Hi,
Thanks for this good news.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:09:05AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> recently ghostscript 8.60 was released [1] which is now available under
> the GPL.
> The features of ESP Ghostscript have been merged into Ghostscript GPL
> and the upstream of gs-esp has officially declared gs-esp obsolete [2].
>
> The Debian gs-afpl package has been orphaned some time ago [3].
>
> So, my question is, what the plan is for lenny with regard to all these
> different gs-* packages.
After hearing this news, the answer is simple. All packages which use
gs-esp in its depends line need to be updated. The most important one
is *cupsys* package which is installed in most system.
> AFAIK, Ubuntu has introduced a new package called "ghostscript" (as
> successor of gs-gpl) which supersedes gs-esp, gs-gpl and gs-afpl and
> provides dummy/transitional packages for gs-esp/gs-gpl which depend on
> the ghostscript package to ensure a smooth upgrade.
I have no preference on this issue. I will follow others.
> I CCed the gs-* maintainers, because I'm interested to know if they
> intend to go the same route or if they have different plans and also if
> there is already a prospective time frame for such a "ghostscript" package.
I CCed cupsys maintainer who only list gs-esp as the sole choice.
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
> [1] http://www.ghostscript.com/awki
> [2] http://www.cups.org/espgs/articles.php?L463
> [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393923
Osamu
Reply to: