Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:16:35 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87sl8v7dxo.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1181752333.3744.11.camel@portatel> (Luis Matos's message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:32:13 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 5fabd6fd0706111420o77eace98oa9cbdfcea4466fbd@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070612183927.GB19540@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 5fabd6fd0706121240w408031cex394e507ff6d5e6ec@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 200706122205.14896.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 1181691754.4094.17.camel@portatel> <[🔎] 20070613000337.GB4569@dario.dodds.net> <[🔎] 1181730532.3867.13.camel@portatel> <[🔎] 20070613103951.GD12013@boogie.lpds.sztaki.hu> <[🔎] 1181752333.3744.11.camel@portatel>

Luis Matos <gass@otiliamatos.ath.cx> writes:

> but why should I??? this goes against the "testing is always *WORKING*"
> phrase. TESTING IS NOT ALWAYS WORKING.

Having to use module-assistant != not working.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: Luis Matos <gass@otiliamatos.ath.cx>

References:
- Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: "Gustavo Franco" <stratus@debian.org>
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: "Gustavo Franco" <stratus@debian.org>
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: Luis Matos <gass@otiliamatos.ath.cx>
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: Luis Matos <gass@otiliamatos.ath.cx>
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@sztaki.hu>
- Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
  - From: Luis Matos <gass@otiliamatos.ath.cx>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#428198: ITP: gabedit -- graphical interface to Ab Initio packages
Next by Date: Re: How to package software with binaries in tarball?
Previous by thread: Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
Next by thread: Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread