[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Two proposals for a better Lenny (testing related).

* Lucas Nussbaum (lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net) [070612 23:17]:
> On 12/06/07 at 22:23 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > NO!
> > 
> > unstable is meant for packages that should be in the next stable release, 
> > as such only packages that are in the maintainer's opinion ready to migrate 
> > to testing should be uploaded to unstable.
> Then shouldn't we have a more aggressive policy about removals from
> unstable, for packages that have failed to get into testing during the
> past n months ?

We have that policy, just nobody who does the QA-bits needed to make
that happen.


Reply to: